Sunday, September 29, 2013

A Scenting Test: Dog 1 and Dog 6


In an attempt to determine what it is that the dogs consider to be their Target Odor - the sample, residual odor or their own saliva on the shaker lids we decided to test that on the scent wheel.

Both Dog 1 and Dog 6 performed one Set of 10 reps.  The cap of the shaker containing the Target Odor was exchanged for the cap of a shaker containing a dummy sample and placed opposite each other on the wheel.


DOG ID #
1 and 6
TEST DATE
9/29/13
TEST
Experiment: Is dog detecting target odor or own saliva?
DONOR ID #

ORIGIN

SCENT TYPE (saliva/spit/sweat/other

SEIZURE TYPE

DATE of CAPTURE
Dog 1: 9/25/13
Dog 6: 9/24/13 
TIME of CAPTURE (before/during/after)

SAMPLE STATE (cotton/gauze pad/clothing/other
Dog 1: dental cotton
Dog 6:  Q tip 
STORAGE CONTAINER (covered test tube/double bagged))
Both sample:
double bagged in container
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Dog 1
room temp
LowBG Saliva
Day5
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Dog 2
room temp
Sage Oil on Qtip
Day 6
MEDICATIONS
Humalog (Dog 1)
SAMPLE SUMMARY
Both dogs had tested 2 completed sessions earlier in the day with their individual Target Odors
SAMPLE SUMMARY & DIFFERENCES
Dog 1
target in 1
cap in 4
Dog 6
target in
cap in
INTENSITY (# of holes
5
11
CONTAINER TYPE
glass salt shaker
glass cheese shaker
PRESENTATION (hand/surface/wheel)
wheel
wheel
# of CONTAINERS
6
6
6
6
6
6
# of SCENT OPTIONS
1


1


REPS
10


10


% SUCCESS
70


80


COMMENTS
*1
*2
*3
*4
*5
*6
TARGET in #
1,1,1,1,1,
 1,1,1,1,
FP was always 4


X,X,

FP was 

always X


EASE OF FIND
1 Very easy     2 Easy
  3 Normal
4 Difficult     5 Very difficult
3







TIME
2m 55s







Dog 1 had completed 2 Sessions plus 1 Ritual  (61 testing reps) during the day with this same Target Odor in the original shaker and cap.

Container #4 contained the neutral cotton and target cap was directly in front of the dog when the test began.  She indicated it.  I did not call her off, nor did I mark with the click, so she continued searching and as soon as she came to Container #1, holding the Target Odor, she indicated.

The second False Positive occurred when it was the first of the "two" containers that she came to, as was the final False Positive.  The False Positives were always #4.

The video makes this clear.  It is now almost as though there are two identical Target Odors on the wheel.

This same phenomenon occurred when Dog 2 tested human and canine seizure scent on the same wheel at the same time. 







 Dog 6 had completed 2 Sessions (60 testing reps) during the day with this same Target Odor in the original shaker and cap.

NOTE:  Waiting for narrative from Team 6.

Dog 5s trainer took the test even farther, giving it 6 different variations.


DOG ID #
5
TEST DATE
10/23/2013
TEST
Odor 3:  wheel
DONOR ID #

ORIGIN

SCENT TYPE (saliva/spit/sweat/other
Odor 3:  
SEIZURE TYPE

DATE of CAPTURE
10/23/2013
TIME of CAPTURE (before/during/after)
am
SAMPLE STATE (cotton/gauze pad/clothing/other
1/2 Q-tip
STORAGE CONTAINER (covered test tube/double bagged))

SAMPLE CONDITION (frozen/refrigerated/room temp/other)
room temp
SAMPLE ID
AGE when USED
Sample X
Day X
MEDICATIONS
none
SAMPLE SUMMARY
tested @ roomt temp; stored XXXX
SAMPLE SUMMARY & DIFFERENCES



INTENSITY (# of holes
13

CONTAINER TYPE
glass salt shaker
glass salt shaker
PRESENTATION (hand/surface/wheel)
wheel

# of CONTAINERS
6
6




# of SCENT OPTIONS
1
1
1
1
1
1
REPS
10
10




% SUCCESS
70%
100%




COMMENTS
*1
*2
*3
*4
*5
*6
TARGET in #
3
5




EASE OF FIND
1 Very easy     2 Easy
  3 Normal
4 Difficult     5 Very difficult
3
2




TIME
1:42
2:03







Dog 5:

*1.  Here scent was put in can 3.  Every lid had Boon's saliva on it.  70%



*2 Target scent in can 5.  Every lid has Boon's saliva on it.  100%




DOG ID #
5
TEST DATE
10/23/2013
TEST
Odor 3D cap test A
DONOR ID #

ORIGIN

SCENT TYPE (saliva/spit/sweat/other
Odor 3:  
SEIZURE TYPE

DATE of CAPTURE
10/23/2013
TIME of CAPTURE (before/during/after)
9am
SAMPLE STATE (cotton/gauze pad/clothing/other
1/2 Q-tip
STORAGE CONTAINER (covered test tube/double bagged))

SAMPLE CONDITION (frozen/refrigerated/room temp/other)
room temp
SAMPLE ID
AGE when USED
Sample X
Day X
MEDICATIONS
none
SAMPLE SUMMARY
tested @ roomt temp; stored XXXX
SAMPLE SUMMARY & DIFFERENCES



INTENSITY (# of holes
13

CONTAINER TYPE
glass salt shaker
glass salt shaker
PRESENTATION (hand/surface/wheel)
wheel

# of CONTAINERS
6
6
6
6


# of SCENT OPTIONS
1
1
1
1
1
1
REPS
10
10
10



% SUCCESS
100%
90%
50%
90%


COMMENTS
*1
*2
*3
*4
*5
*6
TARGET in #
4
6
1
2


EASE OF FIND
1 Very easy     2 Easy
  3 Normal
4 Difficult     5 Very difficult
2
2
4
2


TIME


2:51
3:18



VIDEOS/COMMENTS:

*1. Reminder set  Scent in one shaker, neutral in 5 shakers all clean shaker lids. No video 100%
*2. Set 2 moved scent to can 6.  No other changes. 90%
*3. Changed Saliva contaminated scent lid to shaker in can 3. Place a clean lid on scent shaker in can 1. Boon seemed to indicate whichever one came first.
Also, Trainer needs to click correct responses before notating!  Also helpful if a pocket is available for wrong choice treats to keep the count correct!



*4 Scent shaker with clean lid placed in can 2.  Contaminated lids now in cans 1 and 5.
Boon indicated can 5 once.  90% this trial





CONCLUSION:  We need to include switching caps into the teaching process to further strengthen the dogs understanding of her job - that she is only paid to identify the TARGET odor.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your observations.